theoretical question at this stage

From a simple dustcap to a full on turbo-nitrous breathing monster.
If you have any questions, here's the place to ask.
Post Reply
User avatar
lomsavage
Posts: 763
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 5:29 pm
Location: stalyvegas
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 28 times

theoretical question at this stage

Post by lomsavage » Thu Jun 09, 2011 11:44 pm

hi guys

just asking opinions for now

for the 1327 lump which would be better

dyna s or dyna 2000 ignition,

and if using either would it be better to fit their hi output coils as well

all opinions welcome

thanks

H
Hello from H

"Sponsered By Typhoo and P G Tips and (now) Aprilia also"

No Kats and unlikely to ever have one again :shock: (hey ho, that is what life throws at us)

bobster

Re: theoretical question at this stage

Post by bobster » Fri Jun 10, 2011 6:39 am

You know my views on Dyna stuff.....................

User avatar
lomsavage
Posts: 763
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 5:29 pm
Location: stalyvegas
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 28 times

Re: theoretical question at this stage

Post by lomsavage » Fri Jun 10, 2011 10:58 am

yep,

loads of wd 40

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Hello from H

"Sponsered By Typhoo and P G Tips and (now) Aprilia also"

No Kats and unlikely to ever have one again :shock: (hey ho, that is what life throws at us)

User avatar
Katgeezer
Posts: 909
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 4:02 pm
Location: Orpington,Kent
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 8 times

Re: theoretical question at this stage

Post by Katgeezer » Fri Jun 10, 2011 1:38 pm

You don't have to use dyna coils with dyna ignition systems. I've got some Andrews coils for my big'un, but, they're physically bigger than dyna's so I'll have to be imaginative with placement.
Basically you're getting a bigger spark as you're talking 30kV or even 40kV I believe with some rather than 18-20kV with std ignition so it can't be a bad thing. More efficient burn/bang gives more power surely so every little helps.

As to which one,well I think the 2000 is the newer model isn't it so it'll have the benefit of newer technology one would hope.
What I do know is that they're quite easy to fit and definitely an improvement over stock.
TOO MUCH IS NEVER ENOUGH

THE VULTURE WILL STRIKE

Chris KOC154

Lost count........

User avatar
johnr
Club Member
Posts: 3022
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 9:58 pm
Location: lancashire
Has thanked: 234 times
Been thanked: 342 times

Re: theoretical question at this stage

Post by johnr » Fri Jun 10, 2011 7:56 pm

dyna s is simpler, but the 2000 will allow you to set the redline on its adjustable rev limiter. so it depends if you are often missing gears!!!
My Gallery

KOC 004

DEANOTEK
Club Member
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: BARNSLEY
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: theoretical question at this stage

Post by DEANOTEK » Fri Jun 10, 2011 8:23 pm

Go for the Dyna 2000, i've been running it on the Kat1428cc turbo with no problems, also as JR stated, it has the added benefit of the built in rev limiter,... u dont want to drop a valve if u miss a gear,...we've all missed a gear at some point :roll:
All the best deanotek.

User avatar
johnr
Club Member
Posts: 3022
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 9:58 pm
Location: lancashire
Has thanked: 234 times
Been thanked: 342 times

Re: theoretical question at this stage

Post by johnr » Sat Jun 11, 2011 11:06 am

and if you park it somewhere dodgy you just flick the rev limiter to minimum and anyone who nicks it will only be able to rev it to 2000rpm!!!
My Gallery

KOC 004

DEANOTEK
Club Member
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 2:13 pm
Location: BARNSLEY
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: theoretical question at this stage

Post by DEANOTEK » Sat Jun 11, 2011 12:39 pm

HA HA.... Yes... done that a few times, just make sure u can get your finger in to adjust it. ;)

Post Reply